Fedora vs debian11/24/2023 ![]() Red Hat creates open-source technologies, such as software and other services, and delivers them to business companies. Interestingly, the company that sponsored Fedora also has a hat-related name, Red Hat, to be specific. You remember those cool soft hats, right? You are probably familiar with Fedora’s name, as it was derived from a hat we have all seen multiple times in cowboy movies. In short, Fedora is a Linux distribution introduced in 2003. So, let’s see what Fedora Linux is without further ado. ![]() Well, here in this Fedora Linux guide, we’ll explain everything you need to know about this system as a beginner, from its uses to its pros and cons. But what is Fedora Linux used for, and how have you never seen its function before? Although it is not a new term and has been around for almost 20 years, many people still wonder exactly what Fedora Linux is.Īs “Linux” implies, you may have already guessed that Fedora has something to do with operating systems. ![]() If you have ever played around with distros or worked in the software development industry, you may have heard about Fedora Linux. For me, the common thread is, if I'm running a GUI display environment, I use KDE Plasma 5 everywhere.List of content you will read in this article: ![]() In my case, I run Rocky (RHEL variant) on both servers and in some cases on tablet hybrids, Debian on Windows WSL2, and on rare occasions, Kali (Debian variant) on a laptop. Your selection should depend on what you are trying to achieve with your particular platform. And don't even get me started on all the variations among the display environment offerings (Gnome, KDE Plasma, Xfce, Mate, etc.). RPM For example, you can find rolling release distributions and annual/semi-annual fixed distributions among both major categories (.DEB/.RPM). Debian, Neptune, Sparky, Q4OS, Kali, etc.) or the differences in the RedHat variants (RedHat, Fedora, Centos, Rocky, Alma, Mandrake etc.) are more significant than the difference between the mean distribution for. The differences in the Debian variants (e.g. Scientists that study the various human ethnic groups will tell you that statistically speaking, the variations WITHIN a race of humans is measurably far greater than the differences in the mean values for any two major race categories. It would be nice if there was a deb/dpkg equivalent. (examples, first with UEFI support, first with Wayland support, first with systemd,įirst with NetworkManager, docker, podman, first distro with 64 bit support, etc.) which isn't alwaysĪppreciated or wanted by many users, but usually other distro's follow. Ubuntu may have more games and utilities,īut Fedora/Redhat typically lead in development, kernel extensions and modules, drivers Server environment with built-in redundancy, things like awx/ansible are available for Ubuntuīut they are developed on redhat/fedora systems. Has a few more packages, has more games available natively, and is more friendly for newer users.īut for the server market, there is no equivalent for things like NIC teaming, bonding,īuilt-in cman clustering, anaconda/kickstart, grub-fallback, things that make Linux a reliable This has very little to do with your question, (dnf/rpm vs apt/deb)īut I think for the desktop, Deb/Ubuntu/Mint has more options, in some ways is easier. Partly because I'm more familiar with it, but partly because it handles more of the back-end I will also say building an rpm package is generally easier than building a deb package. apt-get install build-essential vs dnf group install 'C Development Tools' dnf supports "group" installs.Īpt, does have something similar, but typically it's the name of a specific package ratherĪ "group" of rpms, for example. I don't have a lot of experience with custom local apt repo'sīut with dnf and rpm, we have reposync, createrepo, and commands to simply mirroringĪnd creating custom repos. I believe security to about equal between the two.Įase of maintenance. With apt, it's sometimes dpkg, or sometimes apt-get, or sometimes just apt, and I never know I also believe rpm commands are more consistent, dnf install or dnf remove. I still (very rarely I admit) run into dependency inconsistencies in deb/apt. RPMs have been a round a while longer, more mature.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |